Partner Notes — a governance-first, documentation-led early capital track.
For a small group of aligned, sophisticated partners seeking disciplined support for build + pilots — while keeping governance clean ahead of any third-party priced round. Not a public offer or solicitation.
Program shape (board-safe)
Intentionally small. The focus is governance alignment, controlled disclosure, and artifact-led execution — not volume.
Indicative structure, stated in operational terms. Definitive terms exist only in executed documents.
| Dimension | Indicative position | Why it exists |
|---|---|---|
| Track posture | Invitation-only • cohort-quality gated | Governance alignment over count. |
| Disclosure | Board-safe by default • NDA where appropriate | Compatibility with future institutional expectations. |
| Anchor event | Third-party priced round (if any) | Independent price discovery (not self-set marketing). |
| Use of proceeds | Build + pilots + governance artifacts | Proof through deliverables and referenceable outputs. |
How this stays board-safe and procurement-compatible.
- Artifact-led execution: progress is communicated via deliverables and evidence, not narratives.
- Controlled channels: non-confidential by default; deeper diligence only through appropriate agreements.
- Clean governance posture: clarity on what is disclosed, to whom, and why.
- Reversibility until signed: exploration without obligation until definitive documents are executed.
What partner support is buying in practical terms.
| Workstream | What gets built | Board-safe outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Board-ready artefacts | Trust Brief patterns, Ledger entries, Evidence snapshots, action-plan packaging. | Repeatable oversight objects; faster committee cycles. |
| Trust Ledger slice | Ledger schema, evidence IDs, export formats, refresh workflow. | Reusable governance layer (not one-off reporting). |
| Pilots | Time-boxed pilots generating priced proof and referenceable outputs. | External validation through deliverables. |
| Controls/disclosure discipline | Intake controls, “non-confidential by default” flows, procurement-safe posture docs. | Reduced information risk; compatibility with institutional buyers. |
Explore fit → confirm gating → document. Reversible until documentation is executed.
| Step | What happens | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Non-confidential inquiry via Gate intake | Fit/gating response (next step / decline) |
| 2 | Eligibility posture confirmed with partner advisors | Documented gating alignment |
| 3 | Indicative term discussion (if aligned) | Concise term sheet draft (review-only) |
| 4 | Definitive documents + closing mechanics | Executed documents (only binding point) |
No public solicitation. No advice. No confidential diligence exchange via web forms. No promises on timing, valuation, conversion events, or liquidity.
Plain-language reminders for sophisticated audiences.
- Total loss risk: capital can be lost in full.
- Illiquidity: no guaranteed liquidity, redemption, or secondary sale.
- Execution risk: product/GTM outcomes are uncertain.
- Financing risk: conversion depends on events that may not occur.
Submit a non-confidential inquiry. No obligation on either side.