Semi-private • capital structure • Partner Notes economics

Capital & valuation structure (working overview)

This page is a working overview for aligned, sophisticated counterparties assessing Noetfield’s early-stage structure. It summarises the logic behind Partner Notes (cap/discount), illustrates dilution mechanics, and clarifies what is discussion-only versus what must appear in definitive documents.

Not an offer
Illustrative figures
VC-compatible mechanics
Governance-aligned disclosure
Use limitation: non-public. Do not forward or redistribute. Contents may change without notice. If you require decision-grade materials, request a dated PDF memo and term sheet draft via Gate.

Related Partner & Capital pages

Keep the conversation anchored to a consistent set of references (semi-private pages may be noindex).

Valuation logic

Four distinct layers of “value” (do not mix them)

Clarity over hype

Noetfield separates narrative value from contractual economics, and contractual economics from externally set market pricing. This reduces confusion and protects both parties when definitive documents are negotiated.

  • 1) Strategic / internal view. Directional thesis and long-horizon potential. Not contractual.
  • 2) Discussion band. Non-binding conversational range used to sanity-check expectations. Not a commitment.
  • 3) Partner Notes economics. Contractual guardrails in the note instrument: valuation cap + discount (and interest, if applicable). These terms govern conversion, not “today’s headline valuation.”
  • 4) Priced equity round. The first time a third-party lead investor sets price. This becomes the market reference until the next priced round.
Core principle: A “valuation cap” is an economic ceiling for conversion—not a statement of current market value. Market value is only set in a third-party priced round.
Capital path

Illustrative path to the first 1.0M CAD raised

Working example

The figures below are illustrative and simplified to show mechanics. Actual outcomes depend on timing, final terms, total note pool size, option pool creation, and the fully diluted structure at conversion/pricing.

Phase 1 — Partner Notes (current)

  • Target pool: ~300k CAD (high-risk, early stage).
  • Illustrative economics: unsecured notes; 7% simple interest; 36-month term; 30% discount; cap around 6.6M CAD pre-money.
  • Example timing: conversion after ~2 years → conversion amount ≈ principal + ~14% simple interest (illustrative).
  • Order-of-magnitude: at a 6.6M cap, a 300k pool may convert to ~5–5.5% fully diluted (illustrative, depends on cap table at conversion).

Phase 2 — First priced equity round (illustrative)

  • Raise: ~700k CAD.
  • Pre-money: ~12M CAD.
  • Implied new investor ownership: ~5–6% post-money (simplified).
Combined shape: reaching ~1.0M CAD raised may correspond to ~10–11% dilution before any employee option pool is established. (Stylised; do not rely without definitive modeling and documents.)
Partner tickets

Illustrative tickets and stylised outcome ranges

Not a forecast

The examples below are stylised to show relationships between ticket size, conversion economics, and hypothetical company values. They are not projections and exclude dilution from option pools and later rounds.

A) Conversion illustration (cap 6.6M; 2-year hold; 7% simple)
Ticket Illustrative conversion amount* Stylised ownership at cap**
50k 57k ~0.86%
100k 114k ~1.73%
250k 285k ~4.3%

*Principal plus ~14% simple interest over 2 years (illustrative).
**Ownership depends on fully diluted structure at conversion; shown here as a stylised cap-based ratio for intuition only.

B) Stylised outcomes if ownership held constant (excludes future dilution)
Company value Ticket (stylised %) Implied value Implied multiple
25M 50k (0.86%) ~216k ~4.3×
100k (1.73%) ~432k ~4.3×
250k (4.3%) ~1.08M ~4.3×
50M 50k (0.86%) ~432k ~8.6×
100k (1.73%) ~864k ~8.6×
250k (4.3%) ~2.16M ~8.6×
100M 50k (0.86%) ~864k ~17.3×
100k (1.73%) ~1.73M ~17.3×
250k (4.3%) ~4.32M ~17.3×

These are stylised examples only; they ignore option pools, later rounds, and structural changes. Early-stage instruments are high-risk and illiquid.

Design intent

Why this structure (what it is optimised for)

Governance-first design
  • Cap table cleanliness. Use a note instrument early to preserve flexibility and keep later institutional rounds straightforward.
  • Reward early conviction without premature pricing. Cap + discount + (illustrative) interest provide economics for early risk while limiting immediate dilution.
  • Respect external price setting. The first market valuation is set by a third-party lead investor in a priced round.
  • Reduce reliance risk. This page is discussion material; reliance should be on dated, negotiated definitive documents.
  • Governance consistency. Definitions are stable, terms are explicit, and marketing language is separated from contractual language.
Important

Legal, risk, and use limitations

This page is provided solely for high-level discussion. It does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, and it is not investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice.

  • No offering. Any transaction, if any, will be made only by definitive documentation and only to eligible investors relying on applicable exemptions in their jurisdiction.
  • Illustrative only. Any references to valuation bands, caps, discounts, interest, percentages, or outcomes are illustrative and may change; they may not reflect any eventual transaction.
  • High risk / illiquid. Early-stage participation may result in a full loss of capital; there may be no liquidity for an extended period.
  • No reliance. You should not rely on this page as decision-grade information; obtain independent professional advice and request dated documents for any decision process.
  • Confidentiality. Do not forward or distribute without express permission.
Risk reminder: This is a governance product in pilot mode. Terms and structure will evolve with pilots, procurement requirements, and regulatory developments.