Core templates
- Pass/fail gates (minimum standards) checklist.
- Weighted scoring rubric (risk-based, adjustable weights).
- Evidence request list (vendor pack requirements).
- Decision memo template (board/audit-friendly).
Kit • procurement
Use • vendor evaluation
Delivery • Gumroad
A defensible vendor “yes/no + conditions” decision
AI Vendor Due Diligence Kit — gates, scoring, evidence requests.
A procurement-ready pack for evaluating AI and GenAI vendors: minimum gates, weighted scoring rubric, evidence request list, and a decision memo template suitable for leadership review.
Note: This kit is a template pack for internal execution. It is not legal advice.
For invoice/PO service procurement, use procurement@noetfield.com.
What is included
A practical, repeatable evaluation workflow designed to reduce back-and-forth and improve decision defensibility.
Operating guidance
- How to run the evaluation in shortlisting vs contract review vs renewal.
- How to classify data exposure and set conditions for approval.
- How to document exceptions without oversharing sensitive details.
Who this is for
Teams that need a clean vendor decision record under governance and audit pressure.
Primary users
- Procurement / Vendor Management
- Security / IT / Risk / Compliance
- Legal (as an input, not a replacement)
Common triggers
- New AI vendor shortlist, fast cycle, unclear requirements.
- Contract review with data-use and training ambiguity.
- Renewal where auditability and evidence is now required.
AI Vendor Due Diligence Kit — templates delivered via Gumroad.