Material AI map
DeliverableWhich AI use cases matter, where they run, who uses them, and what they affect.
- Materiality thresholds (what counts as “board-visible”)
- Owner mapping (operational + governance)
- Data movement at a usable level
A structured 6-week diagnostic to turn “we use AI” into a board-readable posture: material use-case map, baseline controls, evidence expectations, starter Trust Ledger entries, and a board memo with options.
Practical outputs that survive scrutiny: scope, owners, baseline controls, evidence expectations, starter ledger entries, and a decision memo.
Which AI use cases matter, where they run, who uses them, and what they affect.
Minimum viable controls + evidence expectations (what counts as proof).
First entries for the highest-impact use cases, in an audit-survivable format.
Options, trade-offs, and the next-step governance cadence.
| Week | Focus | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scope + materiality thresholds | Objectives, decision boundaries, initial inventory |
| 2 | Use-case mapping | Material AI map + owners + data movement |
| 3 | Risk & control baseline | Baseline controls + evidence expectations |
| 4 | Ledger entry build | Starter entries for highest-impact use cases |
| 5 | Board memo draft | Options, priorities, cadence plan |
| 6 | Finalize + handoff | Board-ready brief + starter ledger pack + next steps |
Trust Brief and Trust Ledger exports follow the same board-safe style.
Short answers for purchasing and internal routing.
No. Public intake is non-confidential. Secure sharing protocol is confirmed after kickoff.
No. It establishes a defensible baseline, ownership, and evidence discipline to reduce risk fast and keep decisions readable.
Move into Trust Ledger for ongoing cadence: entries stay current, exceptions expire, and board exports remain consistent.
Yes. Use the procurement lane for Invoice/PO. Card payment is available via Stripe payment links.